"But you fail to point out where the Scalia and the majority are wrong."

It's not his duty. Justice Stevens did that.

"Try reading the the Second Amendment and then share your thoughts on the meaning."

Take your own advice, guy. (Of course, you have as much right, under the 1st Am., to make assertions unsuported by arguement as opus512 - or me - but it's a bit hypocritical to cite the mote in his eye and ignore the beam in yours.)

"Most reputable legal scholars and historians have come to the conclusion..."

Riiiight - because if a legal scholar or historian doesn't agree with you or Scalia, he's not "reputable". Ever hear of "begging the question"? (And if four justices of the Supreme court can't be considered legal scholars, what is your definition of the term?)

"Heller should have been a 9-0 decision."

Yeah - the other way. Miller should have been upheld. But that's my assertion....