No, it's still perfectly clear, you're the only one who doesn't get it and I'll never be able to convince you otherwise, which is your right. "Pharmacists for life" are trying to forcefully make decisions for other people. There is no confusion, that's not something that ANYONE should be allowed to do, much less force anyone to carry out a pregnancy against their will. What is this the 50's?

How about if my religious beliefs held that no one should be allowed to have children out of wedlock. And I decided to become a gynocologist, and anyone who came into my office that was pregnant and out of wedlock would automatically be given RU-486 because in my personal, not medical, opinion that's the only way. And I'd convince everyone out of wedlock to go on a longterm foolproof birth control like Norplant, whether they wanted to or not, to make sure they wouldn't come back to me pregnant and unwed. Would that be legal? In both examples I'm forcing someone to do something against their will, but it doesn't make it any more right that the pharmacists are doing their forcing by withholding necessary drugs, either preventative or plan B.

I'm all for anyone's right to protest any law on any grounds. Picket, write your congressman, write/call into sympathetic radio/TV shows, donate money to causes you agree with, make a website/blog whatever. But it crosses the line when you physically block access to medical care just as it crosses the line to refuse access to pharmaceutics that you don't want others taking. That isn't your decision to make for others! That is the point. Say a prayer for the woman to change her mind, remind her that taking plan B is final. But if she CHOOSES not to agree with you then you HAVE to let it go and hope the next one might. The pharmacist doesn't have the power to decide for others what to do within their legal rights. Ignoring these acts is essentially giving them that power, and no one should have that kind of power.