was to "summarize" Sarvis's posts.

You failed in that you didn't provide an accurate summary. You twisted his words (in your summary--let's get that straight) to mean something Sarvis did not intend to communicate.

THAT is where you are wrong and you show your true colors.

You need to focus on listening to posters instead of searching for singular words and terms they write that you can capture and form to your own design and image.

You have a lot of internal mechanisms running "interference" preventing you from understanding what a poster really communicates.