Now, I'm not going to sit here and agree with everything Sarvis says (just trying to pre-empt your very forseeable counter attack) but we do know a couple of things:

1) You got his intent totally wrong.

2) You got his words (intentionally) wrong.

3) You got his connotation and his denotation wrong.

4) You missed his point emotionally and factually.

So far, you seem to be wrong on Sarvis from every angle. You do, as CE says:

search for the worst possible way to twist the intentions of everyone who isn't in lock-step agreement with you