Clinton and Obam talked to the Israeli PAC (both claim to refuse money from all PACs, don't they?) and Obama said that Jerusalem will never be divided, or something like that, and the next day he came out with a "correction" that this issue would be resolved by them, or something like that.

What does that prove? That he got carried away and tried to offer more than Clinton? Was it the emotion of the moment? What if he did meet with the ruler of Iran, after they figure out who that is, would he keep his extremely controlled unemotional demeanor? It is his trade mark. Was he properly prep for the speech? Where his advisors too busy to examine the speech? Did he speak stemporaneously?

Was that a flaw Clinton tried to exploit by meeting alone with him at Sen. Feinstein's home in San Francisco. Where they touring San Francisco? North Beach? Did they have a drink? Was he tired from a flight from the East Coast or from Southern California? Did he learn anything? Did he lecture his staff on what to do the next time?