. . . leaves the question pretty open. Rights not enumerated are reserved for the states OR THE PEOPLE. The language of that amendment is broad enough that EITHER of our views constitutes a demonstrably legitimate reading.

At the end of the day, I'll carve any peasant who shows up at my door to proscribe my chosen actions into steaks; I'm simply suggesting we could save a lot of spilled blood by ensuring that it doesn't come to that. I shouldn't have to get the permission of people who watch Home Improvement to secure a reasonable assurance that I'll be left in peace to offer our generation a cultural legacy worth remembering, or to unwind as I see fit from that (economically) thankless and Herculean task.

It certainly does not mean you can legitimately pretend that the constitution of the United States says that. Because it just does no such thing.

Again, there's enough vagary in the language that such can be said to be implied.

What I'm SURE of is that anything short of my being left the fuck alone by the piddling organisms that would seek to limit my action falls short of any acknowledged dictionary definition of "individual liberty," and if your interest is in seeing that I am so limited, or that ANY governing body maintains the prerogative to so limit me, what you defend is not individual liberty, by definition.