Re: Wrong on the face of it
by
spiker
05/18/2008, 11:41 AM
I'll stick to one example at a time.
I am a rich land holder. I own property with a damn that has an overflow mechanism which if broken, will in a torrential rain cause a backup that would break the damn and likely washout property owners below my property. I figure that if I wash them out I can buy their land and expand my property. So I break the overflow mechanism, it rains, the damn breaks, the people below are washed out and some die.
Did I commit murder? Of course I did.
BTW, there is an idea of right to access when property is surrounded by someone else's property. I can create a road right through your property to get to mine. Your property ownership is not absolute. You can buy property w/ the mineral rights belonging to someone else. When you have sex you ostensibly have consented to given the fetus rights to your mineral property. The fetus in good faith accepts that gift and begins to work to create whatever product or service you contracted it do. Plancental ownership is shared. At least half the DNA belongs to the fetus.
Your fabricated arguments on this angle are so ridiculous. Especially the idea of placental ownership and teleportation. I can just hear them in some future Supreme Court hearing now. :-)