the true conservative:

[Your argument might have merit if the law addressed a real problem but there has not been even one documented case of in person voter fraud in Indidana history. Given this fact the law is unnecessary. ]

How would you reliably tell if people were commiting voter fraud or not if you didn't require ID's to vote?

That's why you sign your signature and it is checked to see if it matches. What's more difficult; getting a fake ID or mememorizing and forging a signature in person?

[Only Republicans voted for this law. Is this because Republicans are for fairer elections while Democrats like to cheat? The evidence shows just the opposite to be true <link> at least in recent history.]

Rolling Stone is your source? Seriously? LOL!

The article cites multiple sources for the listed information so you don't need to to take their word for it (or mine for that matter.) Even Fox "news" had exit polls that showed Kerry winning big. Don't you find it odd how exit polls are so very reliable in every case BUT this one.