Doesn't anyboby notice how untrustworthy are the HRC's camps? I am not one of those blind supporters who will back BO or HRC if they start making mistakes after mistakes. I am a Democrat before and a supporter after. As such, I will vote democrat in November. Nonetheless, I have to point out while all politicians are scumbags, in the case of BO, he has kept himself on messages. Although I was disappointed by his effort in PA, where both he and HRC have put forth negative ads, I can see why he felt that he had to do it, especially after the horrible debate of ABC, which again BO should have avoided criticizing. My point today is that HRC and her camps are running around telling everyone that both FL and MI should be counted or we are facing the possibility of disenfransizing the people's votes. That's true to some extent. But, the real problem is that HRC is not doing this because she cares about FL and MI, and unfortunately the Dems will pay for that. The rules were set at the beginning of all contest and everyone agreed to them. Now in the middle of all contest, almost to the end, HRC is trying to convince people that the rule should change. Not only what she's doing will damage BO, it will damage the whole democratic party in favor of the GOP. It's obvious that HRC is a very calculated individuals. She has been running around to claim to SDs that BO is unelectable. Doesn't that tell us all that we need to know about her tactics? Again, Dems are a bunch of dumm individuals who will realize the reality of what HRC is doing after November. Too late. Hm! And she will have the audacity to run again in 2012. She's 60 years old. She knows a win for BO automatically knocks off her chance to ever become president. The DNC and all SDs, plus unfortunately millions of Dems throughout the country do not realize this, and it's sad.

To go back of the rules of the primaries again. The rules clearly state that the candidate with the most pledge delagates win, not the most popular vote. Plus, all candidates entering the nomination contest knew that FL and MI would have not played a big role in selecting a nominee if they broke the rules, which they did, and the candidates initially abode by those rules, at least that's what Howard Dean thought. Since HRC thought that she would sail through with victories everywhere, she did not think FL and MI would have played a role in anything. But, now BO, an outsider and a freshman, comes from out of nowhere to take that nomination (fairly) away from her, the lady is turning into a real beast, who will bite BO with every teeth in her mouth. And many SD's are buying her arguments. That's sad. Let's examine this a bit simpler. For those of you play soccer, let's assume that two teams Brazil and Argentine are playing in the final game of the world cup. Both teams know the rule of the game set by FIFA. They fairly know what infractions will carry an automatic red card. If in the middle of the game, one team commits more faults and as a result the referee ejects two teammates, the other will FAIRLY benefit an advantage and will, with fair expectation, win the game. That's not necessarily what will happen, but the expectation will at least be that. Fans of either team will talk about whether it was a fair match or not. The truth remains that the winning team has nothing to do with what the referee has called as a reason to eject two players of the losing team. Will fans see it this way? Depending on which side you're in. For now, HRC in on the losing team and is trying to change the rule. Is it fair to accuse the other team, the referee, or the system? I think she knows too much about politics to be innocent of not interpreting the rules the right way. She knows well what she's doing. The question is whether she'll be successful with it. Shame on all news organisation that do not report the truth to the people, and instead worry about headlines and ratings. Shame on many of us Dems that are, as the Repubs put it, ignorant of our own ignorance.