So... the winning candidate should bow out because the underdog doesn't care if she is causing irreparable damage to the party?

So... we should nominate for the PRESIDENCY that person who doesn't care who she hurts as long as she gets what she wants?


According to this article, Hillary is a maniac, who will stop at nothing to become president and Obama is the one capable of making the adult decision and saving the party.

I don't necessarily agree with this, but as it is written the article paints Hillary as someone who should NOT be in the White House, and Obama has the qualities of someone who should be.

If we accept what Wilson has to say about the candidates, then we should come to the opposite conclusion. We shouldn't be handing the highest office in the land to someone that unscrupulous and self-interested. According to him, she has taken the party hostage and will start shooting unless we give into her demands. What is even more surprising is that this is coming from a Hillary supporter.

Chris, there are much better narratives as to why Hillary should get the nomination. Claiming that we should all surrender to her before she hurts us all is not a legitimate line of reason for this campaign.