Even before her Pennsylvania victory, HRClinton was ahead in the "electoral votes" represented by the state primaries she has carried. Talk of popular votes, of states won, even of superdelegates pledged, in the end come to nothing if not to the electoral vote tally. Sure, the superdelegates can decide the nominee, but why put up a nominee who can't win the necessary electoral votes? The question becomes: is the goal that we have a Democrat in the White House? or that we offer Hope to the nation as an exercise and moral posture even if that Hope will probably not prevail in November? Why would superdelegates select one who can't collect the electoral votes necessary? Is this about winning, or showing?