too much contradiction. The DNC is not conspiring against Hillary, there is not some group of rogue Democratic Senators out to get Hillary, and Hillary said not one word about FL or MI until after she knew she'd need their votes (for this reason I find her new role as "champion of the disenfranchised" self-serving and disingenuous to say the least).

There are many in the democratic party who think Obama was a mistake and had not been properly vetted before he was pushed into the arena.

That is a problem now for the DNC and for the party at large.

So, what you're saying is that some voters will not get the candidate of their choice, right? Again, how is that different from any other primary race even run? How would it be different if it was Hillary winning and Obama supporters not getting their choice? What, exactly, is the DNC supposed to do about that? I'd really love to hear the speech Howard Dean would have to make to sell a superdelegate coup.

"We thank all of you new voters who participated, but you're just too damn stupid and you picked the wrong guy! We'll just fix that problem for you and nominate Hillary instead. No harm, no foul, right? Really, we know what's best for you. We know you'll be happy as lifelong Democrats. Thanks again, and we look forward to seeing you at the polls!"