after all, he lied repeatedly about iran training "al-queda," until joementum corrected him. he has supported a disaster of a war, where many people have suffered and died, and then is lying about who is causing their suffering, and how. mccain wants to expand this suffering into an iranian war, and lies about training of al-queda to stir up more suffering. note the years - in 2003, there were no al-queda in iraq, and now, well, john mccain wants us to believe iran is creating all of the problems we unleashed. hey, hillary sucks, but so does mccain. after all, to lie repeatedly about this means

"either a) that [he] lies without conscience or reflection; or b) that [he] is subject to fantasies of an illusory [present]; or c) both of the above. Any of the foregoing would constitute a disqualification for the presidency of the United States...It's hardly necessary for me to point out that the United States did not receive [any security from al-queda] in return for its acquiescence in the murder of tens of thousands of [iraqi] civilians... Is there no such thing as shame? Is there no decency at last? Let the memory of the truth, and the exposure of the lie, at least make us resolve that no [bushian] ever sees the inside of the White House again."

it practically writes itself. who'll bet the next hitch article will address mccain's serial lying? anybody? anybody?