Sinotrain vs UncleSamtrack: China Wins
by
DuckworkerMike
05/15/2009, 1:53 PM #
In the US, I can get my family from Boston to DC and back on the high speed train for the cost of... a used car. A decent used car at that, which is why we drive instead of take the train.
In China, by contrast, trains are getting faster and faster-- What used to take nearly 40 hours (the Shanghai to Beijing run in the early 1960s) is now down to about eight hours for the fast nonstop, and train tickets, especially on the slightly slower trains, are very reasonably priced. Chinese trains move, literally, hundreds of millions of people on a routine basis. And fast. If you wanted to go to Tianjin, which I don't, the trip takes about half an hour to go 120km, with trains departing every ten to fifteen minutes. Tickets are about $8 and about $9 for first class.
Trains in this country need to speed up and get a lot cheaper before people will consider them a viable alternative to flying or driving. It's a matter of public policy: if there is a greater social benefit to people using trains, then the government should support and subsidize train usage. If there is not such a benefit, then left to market forces, passenger train service will remain a minor piece of the transportation pie.