enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 3 (40 items)   1 2 3 Next >
For the edification of the board...
by SouthernGal
+1/-1 Reply

There is a treat at the bottom of my post for you Cassie Edwards [romance novelist and writer of American Indian genre] fans.

What is a plagiarist?

Literary Dictionary: plagiarism

plagiarism [play‐jă‐rizm], the theft of ideas (such as the plots of narrative or dramatic works) or of written passages or works, where these are passed off as one's own work without acknowledgement of their true origin; or a piece of writing thus stolen. Plagiarism is not always easily separable from imitation, adaptation, or pastiche, but is usually distinguished by its dishonest intention. A person practising this form of literary theft is a plagiarist. The older term plagiary was applied both to plagiarisms and to plagiarists.

What does the law say about plagiarism?

Law Encyclopedia: Plagiarism The act of appropriating the literary composition of another author, or excerpts, ideas, or passages therefrom, and passing the material off as one's own creation.

Plagiarism is theft of another person's writings or ideas. Generally, it occurs when someone steals expressions from another author's composition and makes them appear to be his own work. Plagiarism is not a legal term; however, it is often used in lawsuits. Courts recognize acts of plagiarism as violations of copyright law, specifically as the theft of another creator's intellectual property. Because copyright law allows a variety of creative works to be registered as the property of their owners, lawsuits alleging plagiarism can be based on the appropriation of any form of writing, music, and visual images.

Plagiarism can take a broad range of forms. At its simplest and most extreme, plagiarism involves putting one's own name on someone else's work; this is commonly seen in schools when a student submits a paper that someone else has written. Schools, colleges, and universities usually have explicit guidelines for reviewing and punishing plagiarism by students and faculty members. In copyright lawsuits, however, allegations of plagiarism are more often based on partial theft. It is not necessary to exactly duplicate another's work in order to infringe a copyright: it is sufficient to take a substantial portion of the copyrighted material. Thus, for example, plagiarism can include copying language or ideas from another novelist, basing a new song in large part on another's musical composition, or copying another artist's drawing or photograph.

Courts and juries have a difficult time determining when unlawful copying has occurred. One thing the plaintiff must show is that the alleged plagiarist had access to the copyrighted work. Such evidence might include a showing that the plaintiff sent the work to the defendant in an attempt to sell it, or that the work was publicly available and widely disseminated.

Once access is proven, the plaintiff must show that the alleged plagiarism is based on a substantial similarity between the two works. In Abkco Music, Inc. v. Harrisongs Music, Ltd., 722 F.2d 988 (1983), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals found "unconscious" infringement by the musician George Harrison, whose song "My Sweet Lord" was, by his own admission, strikingly similar to the plaintiff's song, "He's So Fine." Establishing a substantial similarity can be quite difficult as it is essentially a subjective process.

Not every unauthorized taking of another's work constitutes plagiarism. Exceptions are made under copyright law for so-called fair use, as in the case of quoting a limited portion of a published work or mimicking it closely for purposes of parody and satire. Furthermore, similarity alone is not proof of plagiarism. Courts recognize that similar creative inspiration may occur simultaneously in two or more people. In Hollywood, for example, where well-established conventions govern filmmaking, this conventionality often leads to similar work. As early as 1942, in O'Rourke v. RKO Radio Pictures, 44 F. Supp. 480, the Massachusetts District Court ruled against a screenwriter who alleged that a movie studio had stolen parts of his unproduced screenplay Girls' Reformatory for its film Condemned Women. The court noted that the similar plot details in both stories— prison riots, escapes, and love affairs between inmates and officials — might easily be coincidental.

See: Literary Property; Music Publishing; Publishing Law.

Now for the Cassie Edwards fans...

Wednesday, January 16, 2008 Cassie Edwards Accused of Plagiarism.

An article in the local newspaper recently caught my eye. Headlined :"Romance Novelist Accused of Plagiarism," the article - where popular romance novelist Cassie Edwards was criticised for allegedly using other writers' material in her books without attribution - actually stunned me.

Apparently, Cassie Edwards, the author of more than 100 novels with about 10 million copies in print, had been caught with her hand in the cookie jar after a romance novel website, SmartBitchesTrashyBooks, compared numerous excerpts from her novels with passages from magazines and non-fiction books found through Google's search engine.


One of the examples juxtaposed text from Edwards 1997 novel, Savage Longings, with a passage from George Bird Grinell's The Cheyenne Indians, an ethnography published in 1928. The plagiarism was startling with the stolen passages and words standing out like an ocean beacon shining in the dark of the night.

Worse, she has now angered the biggest name in the romance genre : Nora Roberts, the bestselling romance novelist whose works has sold hundreds of millions of copies. "Given the side-by-side comparisons I've read, it seems clear Ms Edwards copied considerably portions of previously published work and used them in her books without attribution to the original source. By my definition, copying another's work and passing it as your own equals plagiarism. As a writer, a reader and a victim of plagiarism, I feel very strongly on this issue," she told The Associated Press.

Plagiarism Guide

And the accusations of plagiarism seems to be growing. In an interview with Newsweek, nature writer Paul Tolme, accused Cassie Edwards of copying his work on the endangered black-footed ferrets in her romance novel Shadow Bear.

What took the cake was Edwards defence. In an interview with Associated Press, she acknowledged that she sometimes "takes" material from reference books but did not know she was supposed to credit her sources. Come on! A writer with at least 25 years experience not knowing basic protocol and etiquette? Even much lesser mortals like me know the need to first ask permission and attribute accordingly any borrowed content, notwithstanding the doctrine of fair-use.

Having been a victim of content theft myself, I can certainly understand the anger felt by those whose works have been stolen by Cassie Edwards, but while plagiarism - something that is very common and happening with increasingly regularity in the Web - is a nasty habit that lesser mortals like me have to live with, it has never occurred to me that it can happen in the hallowed halls of established and published authors.

If the accusations are true, it just goes to prove that nothing is sacred anymore, not ethics or hard work - just instant gratification, money and fame. The joy and pride in the efforts that are needed for any success seem to be traits that are fast disappearing in modern society where the incessant need for instant success without wanting to put in the efforts required has led to an erosion of values like ethics, hard work and integrity. That it is happening in the hallowed halls of the literary world just makes it so much harder to accept.

*Further reading :
- Romance Novelist Accused of Copying - The New York Times.
- Paul Tolme Amused by Cassie Edwards - Newsweek.
- Plagiarism by BeboAuthor

Posted by My Den at 11:05 PM

Labels: , , , , , ,


I have never liked Cassie Edwards as an author and I am now glad...what a disappointment that would have been if I had. tsk tsk SG
Re: For the edification of the board...
by JackDallas

Either they don't care or your post went right over their heads.

Jack

Re: For the edification of the board...
by The_Watcher

At age 11 I tried my hand at stealing and it left me with a very uncomfortable feeling which left a lasting impression on me to this day. No one knew what I had done so there were no repercussions for my actions. Mom still poured the usual amount of affection on me, nothing had changed. Nothing changed except for the way I saw myself after what I had done. I had a bad feeling in my gut that became worse when Mom called me a good boy and expressed her love for me. Those were some of the worst days of my life. I don't believe anyone could have done a better job at chastising me than what I did to myself.

Some people just don't have the ability to experience the gut wrenching guilt like I did and actually do something about it. It's futile to even try to change them, like a habitual liar, you can briefly shame them but never really fix them. Maybe it's not that no one cares but that they realize there is no way to improve the judgement of a basicly good person who fails to constructivly use self guilt as a method for change. The best we can do is simply tolerate the shortcomings, see them for what they are but throw them a bone once in a while for the better aspects of their character and hope for the negatives to change. Spanking them will get you nowhere fast. Choosing to avoid them may make you feel better in the long run.

Re: For the edification of the board...
by JackDallas

When I was about 6 or 7 years old, I swiped a Baby Ruth candy bar from a store where I had gone to with my mother. I kept it in my pocket until I got home and then started eating it. My mother saw me eating the candy and asked where I got it. I had no option but to tell her the truth.

She put me in the car and drove me back to the store, paid for the candy, and made me apologize to the guy at the store. Then she took me home and busted my little ass. She didn't love me any less but she would not tolerate stealing.

Denny's friends at KFS need to bust his ass...for his own good.

Jack

Re: For the edification of the board...
by The_Watcher

At least you were impressionable enough to get the message. That's the point I was attempting to show. Some have quirks which will limit their ability to become self traumatized enough to learn from their wrong doing experience. In the case of some repeat offenders this is perfectly clear.

My brief experiences with the person in question leads me to believe that he is a person who is kind enough to be considerate of others. He avoids being offensive because of that. The quirk lies in the fact that an otherwise thoughtful and kind person would repeatedly do something seen as unacceptable by the very same people he is so gentle with. His actions appear intentional but his general demeanor seems to not support willful wrong doing. Deep inside his psychological makeup is a quirk that hasn't allowed him to act on something he had been confronted with before. There isn't enough combined power on this board to bust his ass enough to have him change. Those who are offended by his actions should speak their mind, report him, avoid him if necessary and just move on to the next issue. Someone who he considers a friend should peacefully take him to task and simply have a talk. Spanking him over and over for the same recurrent thing seems to get those who were offended absolutely nowhere. Life is too short to dwell on the things we apparently cannot change.

Re: For the edification of the board...
by LAM

well done, Watcher.

Where these two goofballs (SG and Jack) make their big mistake with these oh so unadorable little stories about their mom's spanking them when they were children is:

1.) denny is not a child and

2.) they are not his mommy.

If KSF accepts denny and the Slate eds have given him over 20 Editor's Picks this past year on Poems Fray, who are these two nimrods, along with the ever obsessed and hateful catcrapper to say he 'needs a spanking" !? Dear God..what the hell is wrong with them!?
denny needs a spanking from the likes of those three buffoons.

Oh brother!

den's a friend and these intermittent stalk fests SG and cat go on is sick as can be.

Last year it was Loree they went after, now denny.

It didn't work out well for them then and it's not looking any more successfuil for them in their nasty little hate quest this time either.

a 'spanking' ...they say he needs.....in fucking deed.

righhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhht.

morons.

Again totally agree with you, The Watcher...
by SouthernGal

Surely, if we got this at a young age you'd think a grown adult would have. Oh well, we see that Denny is not the only one who never grew up to have a conscience. Some people decide to just stay stupid their whole lives....really pathetic.

Thanks for responding.

SG

Re: Again totally agree with you, The Watcher...
by LAM

It has nothing to do with conscience.

It has to do with realizing denny is not your child,and you are not his punisher.

You are not in any position to stalk a peer and an adult,like he was some sort of prey. That's sick. Talk about a lack of conscience!

When I read how you lied to your mom as a kid and then you yourself noted:'of course I lied' in your post above as if it's normal top lie to ones mother..I saw then just what your problem is.

It's your own lack of conscience at casting blame and kicking at people that is at the heart of what makes you tick.

You wrote that as if it were normal to lie,carte blanche,to your mom. you wrote"of course I lied to her"

Guess what?it isn't normal to lie.

It shows someone who was raised badly and without a conscience.

And then to add insult to injury,you not only were a conniving,self centered,cowardly liar as kid,you then added insult to injury by casting the BLAME onto you baby sister.

That kind of shows a lack of conscience on your part.

Saying you feel bad now is alie since your behavior here in casting blame continues in your adult life. So it would seem you don't feel guilty at all.

I never understood until now how you could be so sick to go along with crazy cat and stalk tempo and then Loree and now denny when ever cat goes on one of her psycho stalking spells.

I always wondered when you pretend to act so sweet,how you could be sucked into going along with her on her psycho stalk sprees..now I see that you are just inherantly, from the time you were a kid ,someone who lied as if it was the thing to do and then blamed someone else(your own baby sister) for your own wrongdoing.

You enjoy casting blame on others. because you do it here all the time.

You lie about feeling guilty and yet ....You come here and continue to both stalk and to cast blame on denny, and before that Loree and before that tempo.

cat's that way due to her dysfunctional control freak father who couldn't even allow the kids to enjoy hanging ornaments on the tree without battering and her alcoholic battering husband and then her car accident and brain injury.

but you your just sick on the natch....you both get off on being sicko stalkers....

birds of a feather and all...

Don't even get me started on the needle dicked wife cheater who looks like Gomer Pyle before he went into the marine corp........

heh! What a loser."SHAaaaaZam"

ugh

Your honor...I rest my case...LOLOLOLOL
by SouthernGal
.
You have no case. moron.
by LAM

my but they grow 'em stupid in Texas.

Finally some conscensus around here!
by Mister Fatface
LAM:

Guess what?it isn't normal to lie.

It shows someone who was raised badly and without a conscience.

Right on baby! It isnt normal to lie. Denny shouldnot have lied about cimposing "Life's Adventure" and the one from the NY times Jack found too. It shows he was raised badly without a concience.

Re: Finally some conscensus around here!
by LAM

well if you could have cimposed a post that had a point..you think your point is pertinent, but it is not.

Democracy means ..majority rules. The majority here want you and your ilk to leave him alone.

So case closed...and get lost little loser.

Re: Finally some conscensus around here!
by Boss Greer
LAM:

well if you could have cimposed a post that had a point..you think your point is pertinent, but it is not.

Democracy means ..majority rules. The majority here want you and your ilk to leave him alone.

So case closed...and get lost little loser.

Even if you are correct with your 'majority' comment, what ever gave you the idea that these forums were democracies?

He plagiarized. That isn't even in dispute among people with any intellectual honesty at all. Add to that his previously similar cases and a pattern of deliberate deception emerges.

It's not the end of the world, nor is it even particularly important in the grand scheme of things, but let's not pretend it didn't happen.

I have no axe to grind, nor do I know or care about any vendettas, but the fact remains that he took that which he had no claim to. Theft is theft, no matter how much you like one party and/or dislike another.

Re: Finally some conscensus around here!
by LAM

Mr Greer, Just exactly how many time are you going to repeat this same tired line?

You have been posting this now for days. People, therefore surelu already know your opinion on the matter.

And....at the end of the day..it changes nothing. denny will do what denny will do.

Slate has no problem with denny. The majority of KSF have no problem with denny so this endless reiteration of your opinion over and over again brings nothing new to the matter at all.

Maybe it's best at times, to just let go of this.

For the peace of the fray.

Re: Finally some conscensus around here!
by Boss Greer

I suppose I'll repost it as long as folks like you keep trying to pretend it didn't happen and/or telling me I should ignore it.

I'm thinking you've probably posted more on this than I, so which of us appears to have the greater fixation? (No, I didn't check...)

I appreciate your position, but I'm not of a mind to discount this. Not yet at least. If it would bring you some measure of satisfaction, I would be happy to let you know when I am?

And again, I am singularly unmoved by your 'majority' argument. Perhaps you have a better one?

Page 1 of 3 (40 items)   1 2 3 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML