he'd have preferred or intended.

You can say that. It would be silly, a bit hyperbolic, and I wouldn't be quite sure what you meant. But you can say it anyway.

I find it extraordinary to imagine that you (and your fellows) can heap scorn and derision upon anyone from Michelle Obama, to Nancy Pelosi, to Barney Frank, to Chris Dodd, to Joe Biden fully aware that it is these people's choice to make themselves public figures and thus part of their lives will result in being subjected to whatever whims and fancies anyone would like to say about them, their public personae, their viewpoints and their actions... but a person clearly sets out that they simply cannot stand Sarah Palin and it is "Palin Derangement Syndrome" and I'm jealous of her and it shows you how despicable my soul is.

Yeah, sure, go ahead. It makes so much sense.

Though I have some hope that you'll actually reflect upon it.

But now that you mention it, I agree. I think you're jealous.

And I DO love those red high heels.

. . . by refusing to address a reasonable query. It's a clever looking move, playing the fray octopus, squirting out an inky cloud of smug and swimming off.

But she asked something reasonable: What makes enmity pointed at Sarah Palin different from the enmity everyone on this board directs toward public figures every day?

See Jack's response to me.

On this very subject. It was unpleasant.

Or perhaps you're mistaking me for someone else. OR perhaps you're mistaking another subject for this one.

In any case, I don't know which unpleasant Urq response I'm looking for. Care to provide a link?