Re: Obama's Presidency: Hindered by His Supporters?
by
jeqal
04/24/2008, 2:39 PM #
what shitting are you referring to?
Why do you not think that the Dem party will not lose votes of older white working class people to the reps if Obama is the nominee?
I think the older white working-class mentality, liberal or conservative, has controlled the national agenda about long enough.
Since the only thing you have defined is based on race not on class, what you risked is sounding racist, which it is.
I welcome young voters and the intelligencia. Let's follow their lead for a change.
A rounding call that only an obamakin could make.
Not very logical, but encompassing the major obamakin traits of reason free, emotion filled, youth oriented racism.
definition of intelligentsia "to be those well-educated members of the population who
undertake to lead the people as scholars, teachers, clergy, engineers,
and who guide for the reason of their higher enlightenment. "
I can certainly appreciate the ardor of obamakins, while also appreciating the caution of hillarians.
Cautious because older voters have been this happy whoo ha route before. Unless you are from the 60s and are blithely hopeful that a new LSD free love era is imminent then you are from the 70s and now know that Papa Brady was gay, and that Peter would be divorced 3 times. Let the good times roll.
I'm skeptical. I know that Generation X is a split group. I wasn't old enough to vote for Carter but I do remember some of the chaos that was America during his reign. Now we have a new candidate that is a fresh face, who was vetted by the Kennedy's known for their saavy testing of the momentum of the political waters. What should have been a swift victory for Hillary became a campaign quagmire equal to the RFK race before it's fatal conclusion.
Obama and his self-interest has split the DNC, not a terribly cohesive group on it's best hair days anyway. The middle of the DNC switches Rep to Dem depending on how left or right their party and the platform goes.
Obama is unique in that he encompasses Wallstreet Economics with Left wing foreign policy. Hence the term fasco-liberal, which is simply a descriptive term and one that is apt.
He voted against Hillary on the Housing crises in Feb of 2008 in favor instead of counselors to help the distressed and probable evicted mortgagees.
In the Chicago debates of 2007 he advocated a forceful strike against Afghanistan without diplomacy. Something that Hillary came out against.
Obama is far from Progressive except that he is not yet 50. The label is applied to him because he is an unknown quantity.
His affiliation with Brezezinski places him firmly into the Carter year style anti-communism, tough on Israel, terrorist filled years, replete with US sanctioned overthrow of the Shah of Iran and placement of the Islamic Fundamentalist Ayatollah. Brezezinski's agenda is tough on China and Russia, control of oil is seen via the Sudan not as much Iraq, and the focus would be on Afghanistan.
I'm not really into the Carter years. Jimmy and Billy, Grandma Lily were cute, but otherwise no thanks.
This whole US thing of you hit 50 and you hand over the reins to the next generation is stupid. People are living into their 90s now, the retirement age of 65 is being raised. I'd be surprised if it did not reach 75.
The real issue is population. Effective population controls are birth control, abortion, male selective life and war.