Re: Blacks do not need racial harmony or white americans
by
indigo
07/11/2007, 5:11 PM #
donjohn5 wrote the following post at 07-09-2007 5:33 PM:
I realize I sound racist in making the "black"
comments, but put my posts together and I hope you'll see that I
understand that skin color has nothing to do with intelligence or
teaching skills, but that culture does. Furthermore, the politics of
race make it an issue by separating scores of students and teachers,
thereby heightening the contrast.
I come from a Midwest
culture where a high reading level is assumed, where, as Garrison
Keillor put it, we were nearly all "above average." Black kids in Iowa
performed about as well as their white counterparts, so I had no
preconceptions about that coming to Houston (which recruits teachers in
Iowa colleges quite heavily). Imagine the culture shock when I found
and found the dramatically lowered standards, even among my colleagues.
Two of the coaches who were to teach Geography had no idea how to
figure out latitude and longitude! Though I found the TECAT test to be
ridiculously easy, several teachers in my school had taken it numerous
times without passing it.
I
hear you donjohn. It seems that the issue on the table in this post is
that of differing standards in different states/ regions for teachers
and students, and as you stated, culture. It seems that we can agree on that! Of course, the standards for teachers, as well as
numerous other factors in the educational/political equation affects
the education the students get. In the public school arena, I learned
while prepping for the Praxis that every state chooses its own passing
rate for their required teacher certification tests. I wasn't very
surprised to find that VA, along with Vermont, and 1 or 2 other states,
had the highest requirements. So a lot of would-be teachers were
nervous about taking it and/or did not pass it. Your comments about the
Midwest culture of reading were enlightening, and help me to understand
your vantage point as a human being and an educator. I "get" that.
Sounds like you were thrown into a bit of a culture shock coming out of
the Midwest, and particularly during your experiences in Houston.
This thread makes me realize that race is actually simply one factor in
this particular convo. The issue of differing educational standards and
outcomes is fascinating in this country, when you look at the effect of
socio-economic group, race, culture, region, religion's effect. I have
a friend who taught for a year at a college in Tennessee. He had
taught, b4 that, at colleges on the Eastern seaboard and the Midwest.
He found that in TN, the (mostly white) students had suffered from a
disadvantage - their GPAs had all been inflated, they could not "think"
as well as he was accustomed to college level students thinking, and
they could not seem to fathom that it was possible for the religious
upbringing that they shared (bible belt territory) to co-exist with
critical thinking. They would stare at him in shocked silence as he
posed rhetorical questions and genuinely (at least in the beginning)
expected them to respond. So there was this whole culture, heavily
influenced by a certain Southern Baptist flavor, that had resulted in
this sort of "non thinking" that had not equipped these students for
college-level thinking. And it had nothing to do with race.
I
read one poster's comments on Europe, and I guess my comments kind of
echo that. It's always more complicated than black and white. There's
region, class, religion, gender, and so on and on. I get the Irish
thing, am fascinated by it actually, the history of "white" man against
"white" man and "black" against "black" - how did we get over here
anyway, if not for Africans selling Africans? Yes, the story of
divisiveness goes beyond white vs. black. But the history of *this*
country is the result of a particular brand of white subjectivity that relied/relies on the black object.
This is not Ireland or Darfur. This is America. Our history happened
the way it did. The best we can do is look at the history and present
of mankind, realizing that we - human beings - in our worst moments,
tend to grasp at any difference and make it a dividing factor. It also
means that America has a unique history, like Europe and Africa's
unique history. I find our country's regional differences more
fascinating than race - southern blacks and whites share a culture as
do northern blacks and whites, as do midwesterners, which certainly
speaks to your experience in Iowa, where everyone is an overachiever
and a reader. I find that fascinating. If only we could start to talk
about race as *a* factor, rather than *the* factor.
You mentioned
Obama. I find him fascinating because of what he represents. Of African
and European American descent, his "blackness" has been questioned by
some blacks. What foolishness. But maybe his very existence in the
public eye will start a new conversation about what it means to be
"black" or "white" or "American" or African or European or Southern or
Northern or Midwestern or Christian or Jewish or any number of labels
that we use to define ourselves and each other. Maybe we'll start to
understand that there are an infinite number of overlapping lines, the
universe expressing itself over and over in infinite ways.
Indigo