It's Not Exposure to Combat
by
trashhauler
11/07/2009, 9:43 AM #
"The exclusion of women from combat is a failed social experiment. It's time to end it.
The author is making a common mistake when describing the combat exclusion. It isn't a social experiment. It isn't even primarily about keeping women out of harm's way.
The close combat exclusion is a rationale for keeping women out of close combat units at the company and platoon level. The Army has only small problems with women being in the support units of the 82nd Airborne, but doesn't want them in the line infantry companies.
The reason is that they want to avoid the splintering, favoritism, and pairing that goes on inside units with both men and women assigned. The reason for the exclusion is sex, who gets some, who doesn't, and all the problems that goes with it. This is not the fault of either women or men, but simply a fact of life when they live and work constantly together. This isn't an experiment, it is the collected experience of centuries.
It has nothing to do with the likelihood of women dying and only a little to do with performance. It has everything to do with protecting unit cohesion. Sgt Munley did a fine job. But her job didn't require months of endless 24/7 contact with her coworkers. She went home to her family each day.