Re: Don't let reason or facts get in the way
by
wilywascal
11/09/2009, 8:59 PM #
Like much of Anne's writings, this article fails to impress. I don't know that
it informs as much as it misinforms. For example, "she has kept Germany
on a relatively even keel throughout the current recession—among other things
by refusing to spend what the U.S.
administration wanted her to spend." OK, so are we to believe that in
Germany, the fate of the economy is determined solely by the Prime Minister--their legislative bodies, businesses, internal and external economic conditions
are to receive little or no credit (or blame)? I doubt even Anne believes that,
so that leaves her guilty of gross oversimplification, at the very least. One might
expect that here in the U.S.
from some of the ignorant electorate, who are often too quick to credit or
blame the economy on the chief executive, but not from reporters who should be
expected to be a bit more knowledgeable and sophisticated.
Furthermore, Anne cites no reason or evidence supporting her claim that
spending more to stimulate their economy would have been bad. We're just
supposed to take her word on that, despite the fact that she is not an
economist. Economists recommend two major ways for government to handle recession: lowering interest rates and directly injecting money into the economy. (Where interest rates are already cut to the bone, like they had been here, that leaves the other option.) Nonetheless, if additional stimulus funds had been allocated and disbursed wisely in Germany, who's to say
it couldn't have helped? Maybe Anne has a magic crystal ball that reveals all
possible permutations and outcomes.
What this sounds like is a female
conservative with an agenda. (See my earlier comment about the preoccupation
with gender here.) The best that can be said about this is that she attempts to
appear objective. But that isn't necessarily always admirable.