enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
If not Whitman, who?
by MikeyD

Anyone who is aware of advertising knows the "New! Improved" has log ago lost its luster. Now its all about "branding". Basically, an ad identifies a particular niche of society, associates itself with that niche, then markets to those who would like to imagine themselves a part of that niche. Whether its sexy partiers in Jack Daniels ads or wholesome concerned parents serving KFC to their children, its all about the branding.

The Whitman ads are effective in this regard, in my opinion. They speak to a century-old tradition of exhuberant, rebellious, sexually adventurous, bustin'-to-break-free American youth. This is a literary tradition going back to Jack Karouac, to Henry Miller, and yes - to the extravagant Walt Whitman, too. The 'tradition' of rebellion. Levi jeans has its own century-old tradition, the last fifty year of which has also been associated with youth. So branding yourself an icon of the historical continuity of youthful exhuberance seems like a good move.

Re: If not Whitman, who?
by evanburke
Absolutely agree, MikeyD. I'm right in the demographic (22) and feel the ad is very effective in speaking to a generation that was once optimistic but is now getting a reality check.
Re: If not Whitman, who?
by evanburke
And in response to that reality check so many my age are getting smacked with, Levi's is presenting (selling) an idea of hope and perseverance and belief in the self. It's an effective ad.
View as RSS news feed in XML