Vitter is acting all huffy about ACORN.

I don't recall Vitter ever opening his books to prove he didn't use any public money buying whores. Can he prove all his sexing around was paid for out of his own pocket? Can he prove none of it was paid for by lobbyists or others with business before the Senate?

To date, he hasn't proven any of that, and yet he has the stone nerve to yap about ACORN.

What a class act.

of ACORN's across the board [five separate states] approval of the importation of 13 year old girls for the purpose of turning them into sex slaves? On what basis are you defending ACORN, which -- by the way -- was considered to be a non-story by the mass media?