enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 2 of 3 (37 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 Next >
I would bet...
by Liberal Patriot
...that where you live is a huge pig sty. A labyrinth of floor to ceiling magazines and newspapers, cigarette butts and soda cans lying everywhere. Toilet hasn't been flushed for months. Do you wear an aluminum foil helmet when you go to sleep? Are your windows boarded up? Grass overgrown? The neighbors children throw rocks and use your house as a target for nasty Halloween pranks?
Re: Will Obama Seize the Radio Stations Next?
by Minnmule
Man I wish I was a legislator. My bill would be simple - Ban all talk show radio. If the thing can't play bass riffs that give you a sinus headache, then it shouldn't be broadcasting. Then you can't have the Rushbo's or Al Franken's of the world. Muffie, you need to relax man. You're going to split a main vein and be goosesteppin' in Hell with the boy who never grew up. Maybe he'll tell you the real meaning to the song "Beat it".
Re: I would bet...
by Island Muffin

Liberal Patriot – Do you need for Obama to carry you in his womb and feed you every thirty minutes, or are you capable of being a self-responsible, fully-functioning individual adult?

Can you name ten things you can do without Government help?

Yet another heinous CON post that distorts reality
by Bruce

1)First you start with the false premise that Jackson and Rush did the same thing. That;'s a lie. The Difference was that Rush had previously called for all drug addicts to be imprisoned,Jackson never did that. Liberals owe Rush no apology for Rush's hypocrisy.

2)Secondly,you go down the same false path by asking if a Governor who shirked his legal obligation as Governor while improperly used taxpayer dollars to finance travel to commit adultery should be fired. NO LIBERAL has called for the firing of Sanford,they have called for his RESIGNATION. This being the SAME Governor who called for the resignation of other public officials who committed adultery.

3)Your use of Clinton's affair is missing the hypocrisy of the two examples above. GET THAT??

4)You claim Letterman was referring to a fourteen yr.old. in a comedy routine. Got a quote proving that?? NO??? WHY THE FUCK NOT? Because Letterman was referring to Palin's other daughter who had been used by a prop for the Palin campaign BY PALIN.

Your idiocy is compounded by your assumption that the talk radio market is a free market.That is simply not the case with a handful of corporations controlling nearly all radio stations and having total control over what programming is allowed. Remember the boycott of ther Dixie Chicks by Clearchannel?? Free market???

Lastly, are you aware that Rush blamed Sanford's trip to Argentina on Obama forcing him to accept stimulus money?

Never mind that Sanford's affair,which is WHY he went to Argentina instead of hiking, began WAY before Obama became president or there was even a stimulus.

What a MORON! Thanks for demonstrating how it is the Right wing that distorts the facts.

Re: Yet another heinous CON post that distorts reality
by Island Muffin

So far, we’ve seen no apologies, only hatred of Rush, corporations and defenses of all things liberal (including shutting down rightwing talk radio).

I am correct on every count…Leftwing Dogma is indefensible, irrational, immoral and hypocritical.

Yes. Obama will seize the "radio stations".
by IdioticStemCell

Actually, it's all laid out in full detail in the upcoming census. The plan is to put those in forced labor camps who test positive for conservatism. This will be handled by OSHA, using taxpayer monies.

The re-education camps (for conservatives only) will be under the umbrella of the FDA. If it becomes too much of a task, then the FDIC jackboots will step in and take control. All of the air waves will be controlled by Obama from the White House itself. Only NPR and Radio Free Ohio will be allowed to broadcast since conservative thought will have been outlawed b then.

Or whatever.

Your A Fuckin Babbling Moron
by saladin
Most Likely a Fat Little White Man....
Re: Yet another heinous CON post that distorts reality
by Minnmule
Oh all right- have it your way - I'm sorry Rush is on the air.
Re: Your A Fuckin Babbling Moron
by Island Muffin

Will any leftwing here condemn the above poster for his racist remarks, or are all left-wingers, likewise, anti-white male (many self-hating) racists, anti-Semites and anti-Christians?

Why are Sharpton, Farrakhan, Malcolm X, Jackson, Wright, Khalid al-Mansour, Obama and other Racial Marxists vicious anti-Semites?

Racial Marxists, like Obama (and the aforementioned “Civil Rights” leaders) use race and gender as proxies for the victimization class to promote economic envy, class warfare and racial hatred in order to facilitate their progressive redistribution schemes.

Because oppressed Jews do well economically and are relatively well educated, their vicious hate-filled "racial Marxist" dogma has been proven to be as false.

If oppressed Jews (the most oppressed people in world history) don’t need affirmative action, then their entire racial Marxist ideology is as incorrect as their false Marxist Messiah, Obama.

Marxism can be summed up in only a couple of phrases, "class struggle" and "victims vs. oppressors." Obama is clearly not interested in the ideas of Milton Friedman and Adam Smith. However, racial Marxists, like Obama, use race and gender as proxies for the victimization class to promote economic envy, class warfare and racial hatred in order to facilitate their progressive redistribution schemes.

How many anti-Semitic “civil rights” leaders do you all need to see before you see a trend? <link>a recent poll found anti-Semitism among blacks three times higher than among non-blacks.”

Black racism comes from the failure of African Americans to achieve at the same rate as Jews, Chinese, Indians, Muslims and etc. Luckily, of the civil right leaders mentioned only MLK didn’t preach racial Marxism. MLK preached a color blind society. So now leftists require racial preferences. Obama is ready to entrench racial discrimination into our judicial system…

Obama was nurtured under Rev. Wright in Black Liberation Theology, based on the teachings of James H. Cone:Theology scholar Dr. Morley states “black theology turns religion into sociology, and Jesus into a black Marxist rebel. While making statements against whites and Asians, it promotes a poor self-image among blacks, and describes the black man as a helpless victim of forces and people beyond his control. Black theology calls for political liberation instead of spiritual salvation.”

The founders of BLT “have worked to incorporate Marxist thought into the black church, forming an ethical framework predicated on a system of oppressor class versus a victim much like Marxism

Other experts contend that BLT is a “scarcely concealed, Marxist-inspired indictment of American capitalism pervades contemporary 'black-liberation theology'...The black intellectual's goal is to "aid in the destruction of America as he knows it." ... Such destruction requires both black anger and white guilt. The black-power theologian's goal is to tell the story of American oppression so powerfully and precisely that white men will "tremble, curse, and go mad, because they will be drenched with the filth of their evil”

Wikipedia: Black Liberation Theology Quotes:

1. "To be Christian is to be one of those whom God has chosen. God has chosen black people!"

2. "Black Power is an affirmation of the humanity of blacks in spite of white racism. It says that only blacks really know the extent of white oppression, and thus only blacks are prepared to risk all to be free."

3. "All white men are responsible for white oppression....Racism is possible because whites are indifferent to suffering and patient with cruelty…because they are men, a solidarity through which each shares responsibility for every injustice and every wrong committed in the world, and especially for crimes that are committed in his presence or of which he cannot be ignorant.'

4. "The demonic forces of racism are real for the black man. Theologically, Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man "the devil."

5. "Racism is a complete denial of the Incarnation and thus of Christianity...If there is any contemporary meaning of the Antichrist (or "the principalities and powers"), the white church seems to be a manifestation of it. It was the white "Christian" church which took the lead in establishing slavery as an institution and segregation as a pattern in society by sanctioning all-white congregations."

6. “Either God is identified with the oppressed to the point that their experience becomes God's experience, or God is a God of racism...The blackness of God means that God has made the oppressed condition God's own condition.”

7. "Black theology cannot accept a view of God which does not represent God as being for oppressed blacks and thus against white oppressors”.

8. "What we need is the divine love as expressed in black power, which is the power of blacks to destroy their oppressors, here and now, by any means at their disposal.”

Re: After MJ prescription OD, liberals apologize to Rush!
by Island Muffin

I’ll give you all infinite Affirmative Action points, if you can acknowledge leftwing hypocrisy, immorality and irrationality.

Why so much h8red?

Re: Yet another heinous CON post that distorts reality
by Addy_

Thanks for demonstrating how it is the Right wing that distorts the facts.

Bruce, your post illustrated perfectly how the right distorts facts, just don't understand the way they refuse to admit when they are wrong.. But at least all are not brain washed and see things more clearly.... Obama's presidential win proves that.

Muffin closes her mind off to all that she opposes.. only her views matter and nothing else.

Leftwing dogma is false.
by Island Muffin

Obama’s election will destroy (is destroying) the United Sates of America: Obama’s pimp-daddy spending habits will not only destroy the US economy but will harm the global economy as nearly every national treasury holds US securities.

Obama will fail. It is a mathematical and logical impossibility that raising taxes on Corporations, small businesses (LLCs that make more than $250K), the wealthy, energy and capital gains will not increase unemployment rates and decrease economic growth. Therefore, Obama’s economic agenda is for other reasons, probably is to create racial/sexual/ethnic equality. Individual liberty, adherence to contracts, minimal Government collusion, and individual responsibility will be thrown out for those who need, from each according to his ability.

The intrusion of Obama’s big Government, free spending, fiscally undisciplined, Socialism will destroy the wealthiest, freest nation the world has ever known. Laissez-faire is the basis of everything that made America great., not egalitarian need. Obama’s proposed Marxist egalitarian redistribution, big Government, collectivist, welfare State ideology is the most destructive ideology the world has ever know, with 140 million worldwide murders and counting…The Road to Serfdom is paved with incremental increases in Government power, socialist redistribution, and the forced cooption of individual rights, property and income, by good meaning progressives.

Don’t ever imply that Obama’s brand of Keynesian Marxism (with a Black Liberation Theology twist) is not far to the left of classical free market economics to the point of being radical. No president has ever been further left. The opposing results of capitalism versus socialism is a nearly absolute, an undeniable truth. Obama represents the antithesis of America. As the US has become the wealthiest, militarily most powerful, culturally most influential nation in world history based on capitalism, Obama wishes to destroy the US with his progressive revolution (to correct oppressor/victimization) by pushing class warfare.

We support sound monetary policies without government intrusion. We reject the intrusion of Obama’s big Government, free spending, fiscally undisciplined progressive redistribution. We demand a firewall between Government and business, like the separation of church and state.

The Keynesian Economics used to stimulate demand is also known as “mercantilism” a consensus flawed ideology. Governments spending us into astronomical debt (taking money from private capital holders) is inefficient and wasteful intrusion/market distortion. Then Keynesians say they will time the economic cycle to repay the debt when the economy recovers – which they cannot predict accurately. Therefore, the inevitable consequences, and it has been tried and tried, is crashing stagflation. The long-term effect of the Keynesian perpetual motion machine is economic destruction, inflation and higher unemployment and increase taxation.

Capitalism is also known as “creative destruction,” where bad businesses fail and are continuously replaced by better and better businesses…Let the market sort things out. Obama is not smarter than the global collective market.

Prove me wrong: Show me any empirical research that support the New Deal, Keynesian economics, or Obamanomics. If you cannot, we are correct.

(I can provide links to research supported by dozens of Nobel Prize winning economists, cited by tens of thousands of researchers.)

Are you smoking Crack or can't you read?
by Bruce

Clearly you did not even read my post because your response is berift of a reasoned counter argument. I laid out the fallacies you presented and all you've got is a blanket condemnation of Liberal Dogma??

You were the one spewing Dogma instead of facts.

No refutation of my pouints about Rush,No refutation of my[points regarding hypocrisy and no refutation of my points regarding the non-existance of a free marrket in the Talk Radio industry.

You've got NOTHING but BULLSHIT.

Re: Are you smoking Crack or can't you read?
by Island Muffin

Bruce –Your point was that because circumstances don’t match exactly, liberal hypocrisy is irrelevant. However, most circumstances are nearly always different; therefore, almost nothing is exactly the same. I could easily counter by saying, “my situation is relatively different from yours;” therefore, my argument is more valid than yours.

Such relativistic arguments are indefensible, because every situation becomes relatively good or bad. For example, one might argue Hitler was good because he banned public smoking and was a vegan, whereas, we know he was completely evil.

Furthermore, relativistic arguments are too simpleminded to attack, because although most things are relative, we complex thinkers know there are absolutes.

Re: Are you smoking Crack or can't you read?
by Island Muffin

The relativist rationalizes his feeling by saying, “David was not talking about statutory rape with the 14 year old daughter present at the baseball game, he was only talking about A-Rod having sex with Palins’s 18 year old daughter (though she was not at the game) because she had premarital sex. And because of her sin, we leftisst feel justified in chastising Palins’ 18 year old daughter.”

A moral person would say, “David should not be discussing statutory rape, or the sex lives of any 14 or 18 year old girls.”

My assignment: Please elaborate (or think) on how moral relativity corrodes societies. This should enlighten you as to the basis of leftwing hypocrisy.

Page 2 of 3 (37 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML