enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 2 of 3 (36 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 Next >
Cut my losses? No losses.
by BFD
I know exactly what I'm talking about Machination.
You continue to stalk me?
by Gatewood
That's up to you. I will point out again that you are leaving a very visible back trail. You might at least consider disguising the fact that you have become a dedicated stalker.
You uprated your own top-post.
by BFD
That's an abuse of the rating system. Clean hands Cicero. Clean hands.
I have to respectfully disagree
by mercurial1

the ratings system provides an easy means to make a statement about the poster and the post, without the time and text investment.

If I was to request any new feature, it would be something that would allow us to choose who can and can't respond directly do us --- not simply a block feature.

Fraycon responses generally speaking are no better than their top posted BS --- a waste of server space.

Perhaps you are
by Gatewood

correct about the historical nature of Fraycon responses. Certainly you are correct that for the previous eight years they have been non-thinking, pain in the butt savages as a whole in their replies . . . just as liberals have degenerated into being and doing now that THEIR people are in charge. Most of the ankle-biters following me from board to board are doing so because they despise my politics and ideological insights, such as they are. No one is more vindictive than a political winner.

I personally prefer the old ignore feature but I am easy as far as solutions are concerned. I think that the old system made things easier on the Fray editor and that today's system just causes headaches.

Since I am a controversial poster the rating system degenerates into a popularity meter. The people disliking my personality automatically down rate my posts. If there are ten of them present then I get a negative ten regardless of the nature of the post itself. If, on the other hand my fans and friends are present then they automatically uprate my post -- assuming that it is not egregious garbage [unlike my legion of enemies, my fans and friends do have the capacity and integrity to make honest judgment calls]. Quite often I have a post with up to five in the plus column and ten in the negative. This is rating the quality of my post? No, it is rating my personality.

For most people this is not a problem, but that happens to me on a routine basis on the BOTF board. Still, I admit that this is a personal hassle not one that may be of import to other posters. That's why I labeled this a Wish List instead of a Demands List.

Thank you for contributing in a sane and civilized manner. Your posting reply example is how this stuff is supposed to be done. A couple of characters posting in this thread could learn from your good example of posting etiquette.

Yes and I explained why I
by Gatewood

do so on the BOTF board. I know the people that stalk my top posts -- such as you -- and once one of them has unthinkingly and automatically downrated my post I uprate it. Were you people good Fray citizens then you wouldn't play your little games, thus abusing the intent of the rating system. If the editor were ask me to contact him it would be simplicity itself to direct him to examples of stalkers like you automatically downrating me and even urging on other posters to do so simply because you do not like my posting personality or my politics or my ideology. The history of your actions is all there in the open for anyone to see.

By your own determined actions in this thread you have clearly stated that you will continue with this posting harassment. That is your prerogative. It's rather sad, but this personality disorder is one that only you can face over time and, hopefully, learn to be honest enough to eventually come to terms with.

Ha! I just noticed that you
by Gatewood

BFD or NickD had removed the rating downmark that one of you placed on my top post the other day.

Very well, now that you have decided to be at least that civilized I will remove my upmark. Of course if you or one of your posting buddies then downrates it again for your usual reasons I will uprate it again to compensate. It's your choice how we play this out.

Re: Perhaps you are
by mercurial1

I recall you from years ago as cicero and Hatuer was it maybe --- if one of the posters you referred to here is correct about your nic list.

I've never blocked anyone, but like you I have managed quite a fan list too, and suffer essentially the same types and forms of harrassment -- if that term apllies. The only diff is I pretty much confine myself to BB, so their is no following me around but there.

As I see it, with the feature I suggested at least the BS responses wouldn't be soiling up your post, and who knows, maybe the idiots would find some cajones and actually address what you TPed in one of their own. How funny could that become? Imo as well, this feature would also take away this fav form of harrassment of the dedicated common rightwingnut troll, who might wilt from boredom if all they are left with is an occasional idiotic TP not worth acknowledging with a response. I haven't posted over on BOTF for years, so I can't speak to the talents of the trolls I'm sure are there now, but those on BB these days are pretty uncreative and witless.

I've learned to love their "-" and generally non-topical efforts at rebutting what I post. The thinking people know what's what, and if I was posting for an audience, they'd be it, not the laughing hyenas that only have strength in their numbers, not themselves.

Well putz
by NickD

If you need to think I follow you around in order to get through your day then fine. Think whatever you like. But I have been posting on this site for years and on Fray-watch and BOTF for years, and TP for years before that. If you can't stand the fact that most people here think you are acting like an ass then quit acting like an ass.

Aside form BOTF and Fray-watch where have I replied to your posts? Where?

Oh and locking a rediculous post so you can't erase it later after you realize how foolish it makes you look is not an attack, its just locking a post so the world sees how foolish you have made yourself look.

But keep up the self delusions if you see it so necessary.

Well said.
by Gatewood

Anyway, as stated; I'm not wedded to either approach as long as we have some sort of filtering feature. If people could ignore or not even see the posters known to be nothing more than drive by ankle-biters [as the other two posters in this thread have become] or mere mindless nits then there should be fewer flame wars.

Yeah I'm Cicero/Hauteur. I crafted the Gatewood nic way early last year and was just getting comfortable in its skin when the Slate/Fray system belched and would not let me use it anymore. Then I spent the entire rest of the year posting with a very old nic [almost as old as Cicero] Demcon, and then I stopped posting altogether about two months ago.

Upon my return, after a bit of password argument with the Slate/Fray system, lo and behold, it acknowledged Gatewood as a viable nic. Unless the system goes fubar on me again, I'll be posting exclusively as Gatewood for the foreseeable future. As I said, I am comfortable with the nic.

It's your choice NickD.
by Gatewood
I gave you a bit of sound advice. Release the rage and bitterness and return to responsible posting. You'll be a better Fray citizen for making that decision.
IF, if....
by NickD

If I have downrated one or more of your posts it was for what I would have considered a good reason. I seldom rate posts. If a downrate by myself was removed it was done by an Editor or a fray goblin and not me. For someone who proclaims not to be concerned with ratings you are awfully concerned about them

Its your choice as to how you decide to behave, I have no control over what games you are playing.

You or your posting buddy
by Gatewood

did down rate the top post and then later removed the mark. I only uprate my own stuff after one of you has downrated it for your delightful little personal reasons. So you were busted. So big deal. Grow up a little bit and you won't have to have your nose rubbed in your own messes any more.

Re: Perhaps you are
by NickD

Gatewood is not being followed and harassed. He is baiting posters with inflammatory responses and call outs then pretending to be a victim of the very replies he seeks. It is very similar to some older women in the bars who have long outlived their youthful appearance yet continue to insist upon being the darling of the place. They'll do almost anything to keep the center of attention upon themselves.

It is a dishonest method to elevate himself without writing anything of substance, he simply proclaims he has substance and expects everyone to accept that he does. That he may have posted with substance in the distant past precludes the fact that he has yet to write a post of true substance since his return. This poster is AKA Demcon and has flagrantly and arrogantly harassed and insulted others for a long time. It seems funny that the person behind this current Nickname now thinks everyone should simply offer him the same respect and deference afforded to quality posters such as TheBell, when in fact he has used his abilities only to flame and play victim. Life, either on the Net or in the "meat world" (a term I recently learned from my nephew) doesn't work that way.

Look, you're embarrasing yourself again.
by NickD

You sure don't care about check-marks and thumb ratings, you proclaim this to be the truth in many many different posts. Yet now you sit in front of your monitor and actually admit to keeping track of not only how many up-rates and down rates you have, but who gave them and possibly why.

You are the fray epitome of a classic narcissist.

Like I said before, if I give you a down rate its because you earned a downrate. I sure as hell am not going to waste my time going back to change it because I am worried about what an arrogant ass such yourself thinks about me.

Get over yourself.

Page 2 of 3 (36 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML