Go to Ask.com


enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 2 of 2 (21 items)   < Previous 1 2
Re: 220 views?
by konark_girl

But how is <-5> getting that he had 220 views?

******************************­******************************

He probably claims that math is a big secular lie! He WOULD have 220 views if you just believe that he has 220 views :) :)

Re: 220 views?
by onio-
Of course, around 175 or so of those views are him looking at it.
Re: 220 views?
by Wrenn

Okay. More on this. I did some experimenting.

(12 hours until I leave for London... ;-) )

I checked CD's post numbers on the 'view posts' under his name.

THEN I logged out. went into each of his threads that way.. and guess what?? His count went up one, each and every time.

So... I was correct in my speculation earlier. The view count on the individual view threads' page takes into account logged in posters (though it won't go up more than 1 view per logged in poster) but will count each and every view of a non-logged in-to-the-fray person/just browsing by, as a new separate person viewing it.

SO... CD is wrong, again. it isn't 220+ views from people on Faith-Based. which makes not a fecking bit of sense anways, there aren't that many of us, it takes into account us looking at it as 1 count (and a number of us admit to looking at it to see what others have posted, not what he has) AND it takes into account 'drive-bys' as separate view, no matter if the same person drives-by it more than once.

Still. It's idiotic. So what if anonymous people look at what you post, they don't respond, and the number of people who respond just derail the thread and ignore what you post, and do what they like. It's a very low self esteem that takes that as any kind of positive affirmation of, well, anything. Sad. Goes into the 'doesn't have a life' bin.

Re: 220 views?
by dumb_blonde
220 responses would be impressive, but 220 views? I bet he wets himself over that.
Re: 220 views?
by Th Paine
Really happy for you, Wrenn. Have a great trip, and best wishes on the budding romance. OK, I admit it, I am an incurable romantic LOL
I have to admit
by Wrenn

I'm getting a little bit on edge...

HE said, when he called me last night at 6:30 east coast time. "36 hours until I see you again".

Ghods... He was counting. I was just counting DAYS.

Should be fine though. I'm just not used to this type of attention. I'm a GEEK. Guys don't 'fall' for me. Or rather, they get interested over time, based on what's IN my head. Not this almost instantaneous thing. (albeit time has shown it so far to be backed up by so many points of common interest that it's really weird.)

Page 2 of 2 (21 items)   < Previous 1 2
View as RSS news feed in XML