Re: These One-Word Titles Are Hard to Pun (A Sonnet)
by
Paul_Breslin
07/24/2008, 9:13 PM #
It doesn't bother me at all, for three reasons.
1) Everyone has
the right to like or dislike a poem. If I wrote a poem that pleased
everybody, I would become suspicious of it, wondering just what sort of
pandering it was up to.
2) Scads of poets whose work I'd love to have written have been skewered, often brilliantly, in satires;
3) This satire is not attentive enough to the language and style of its object to draw much blood. The best satirists are great close readers of the writing they satirize, though their reading is driven by scorn rather than appreciation (or, sometimes, an ambivalent mixture of both). They zero in on exactly what bugs them about the writer they're attacking. The siren’s angry wail disturbed my sleep, (but who said the speaker was sleeping?)
and now I lie awake, though it has passed while someone, somewhere, gets to rest in peace (nothing said about others "resting in peace," either literally or in the euphemistic sense of an epitaph) I must face a flock of sins amassed.
(Nothing is said about "sins"; no judgment is passed on the justice or injustice of the voices' accusations)
A father who forsook his infant son, (who says he did?)
a mother with no time to ease his pain,
a wife who simply will not be outdone,
(No motives imputed to either mother or wife) a life so boring, brutally mundane.
(No complaint of boredom)
The tyranny of gears advancing time,
and rules (and guilt) to keep me in their way;
the scourge of form, the nagging shriek of rhyme,
and hidden in the mist a waiting grave.
(Again, nothing said about tyranny, gears, rules, form, or rhyme; no metaphor of grave in the mist)
The angel never passes unannounced
(No pronouncement on the existence or nonexistence of angels)
and I would never miss a chance to pout...................... This satire, it seems to me, condemns a poem that does not exist.