Two comments. First, citizens of Indiana are Hoosiers, not Indianans. Second, while the SCOTUS may have forgotten about the 24th amendment, plaintiffs forgot to present even one person who was unable to vote because of the ID Law.

Larry from Indy

That's because they wouldn't have bothered to show up. There is similarly almost no instances, (1?) in history of an imposter trying to vote. Your argument is totally one sided so I can only assume you're agenda is not to analyze the validity of the "lost" amendment but merely to advocate the vote suppression tactic embraced by the Republican court.