If they vote for McCain, then they are pathetically betraying their own female centric positions. Read this article about McCain's treatment of his first wife. In my world, a man who did that to his wife isn't worth the pile of shit he represents.

<link>

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the superdelegates did not steal the nomination from from Hillary. Obama won the pledged delegates, and the superdelegates simply ratified that fact.

Clinton was the one who wanted superdelegates to use their judgment, and they decided to follow pledged delegates.

Facts are stubborn things.

"He has the thinnest resume of any presidential candidate in the history of the United States."

Nonsense. His resume is quite similar to Abraham Lincoln's.

Seriously. Look it up.

My problem with your arguments is that they are based on guilt by association.

Now you may find that to be relevant, but then that brings up a LOT of other problems in this particular election.

Hillary Clinton is VERY closely associated with a known disbarred criminal..an impeached president in fact. One whom she claims to have "helped" significantly, and who has funnelled millions of dollars to her..both personally and into her campaign. Rose Law firm, White Water, Travel gate, Tail hook, Jessica Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, and who is currently under investigation for illegal campaign contributions and fraud in the Peter Paul case. Oh and as far as Ayers and the "weather underground" go..Bill Clinton pardoned two of them who had been convicted. Ayers never was convicted in the first place. So what is your point?

John Mccain has the Keating 5 and A LOT of other lobbyist scadal stuff that has gone on. His campaign is currently run by Charlie Black one of the most infamous lobbyists of all time, and Phil Gramm a lobbyist for a foreign bank, and used to be a Senator, specifically the senator that helped de-regulate the banking industry in such a way that it precipitated the subprime loan crisis. Phil Gramm is the person most responsible for John McCain's economic policy. So, again, what is your point?

WHAT?

You have finally showed your true colors. Farrakhan is evil because he is a black Muslim. Hagee is not because he is Christian.

What part of blaming the Jews for the Halocaust or saying Hitler carried out a divine plan do you consider to be not evil?

Don't answer that. I don't care to know who your twisted brain works.

To BananaBoat:

You claim to be "pro-life" but also claim to be "pro-death penalty" ??? To be pro-life you must value all life; you're not allowed to be selective. In the pro-life movement the life of a convicted killer on death row is valued as much as the life of an unborn child.

bananaboat also seem to think we should have less freedoms during war-time, and that criminals should lose their freedoms (hey, i didn't know freedom meant "only if i do what the U.S. government wants me to do"! What happened to just paying the consequences? Now I lose all my freedoms under the constitution and bill of rights too??). It seem to me that she equates U.S. law to divine law. Why else would she hold U.S. law in such high regard that she willing to kill people and strip them of their freedoms for it?

MAY ALL THAT OPPOSE US BURN IN HELL!!!

but this is also from a woman who doesn't believe women should have the right to make thier own decisions about the birth of their own child. I can't respect someone who wants to dictate what women do with THEIR OWN BODIES. Sure, you may think abortion is wrong, but does that mean that others no longer get to make that decision for themselves? That others spiritual beliefs about abortion don't matter because you think it's wrong? Freedom loving my ass.

Conservatives don't really understand what freedom means, it's just a word they throw around to talk about how great an venerable our country is.

You are correct; Lincoln’s resume was rather thin. The difference being that he was easily the most qualified candidate from any party while the same cannot be said about Obama even in his own party, much less against the Republicans.

Maybe they just have a serious problem with Obama’s limited experience and embarrassing laundry list of friends and associates. Or maybe they just don’t want to see another Jimmy Carter presidency.

Sigh. You're just not very playful are you? I was "obviously" teasing you.

Cassandra

Actually I didn’t say why Farrakhan is evil and Hagee is not, but nice job of implying that I said something when I clearly did not. In fact I never mentioned the words Muslim or Christian in that statement. It would really help you to understand what I’m saying if you bothered to take the time to actually read what I say and then apply it to the topic.

Farrakhan is evil because he supports Islamic terrorism against the United States and Israel. He is evil because he denies that the Holocaust ever happened. He is evil because he actively spreads lies and encourages others to follow them.

Hagee has used scripture to explain his positions. It is a Judeo-Christian belief that we reap what we sow. If we break Yahweh’s commandments we open ourselves up to attack. When he blamed the Israelites for the holocaust he was referring to the fact that their continued sin and rejection of Yahweh left them open for attack. It’s all a matter of context. If you take what someone says out of context and combine it with a complete lack of understanding of scripture then you’re guaranteed to come to the wrong conclusions. Based on his understanding of the scriptures he believes that events took place that encouraged the Israelites to move back to the land of Israel. He believes, as most believers do, that Yahweh uses the actions of man to move his plan forward.

As far as televangelists go, Hagee is among the best informed, but like everyone he is human and he does make mistakes. At the very worst he is simply wrong and nothing he has said or done is anywhere near as bad as what Farrakhan has said and done. They’re not even in the same league.

“Don't answer that. I don't care to know who your twisted brain works. “

Of course you don’t want a response. After all it is much easier to make baseless accusations if you ignore the persons clarification and defense. You’re not the least bit interested in intelligent conversation.