Most unnecessary article ever published on Slate. It was also "mediocre" in the way the writer claims the Pittsburgh Pirates are mediocre, which is to mean it sucked. When a filler piece quotes other filler pieces...just painful.

What if some of us enjoyed reading that article?

Why does it have to be good to you for it to be worth anything?

most unnecessary quote ever published in The Fray. it is mediocre in the way the poster claims the article is mediocre, which is to mean it sucked. when a post cites offers no support to it's central thrust that a piece was "filler" ... just useless.

wow ... that was so easy! i can totally see why you do it.