303 to 189, that's 303 replies showing on Procrastination and 189 replies showing on the main page of botf (including the geezerobsessive brain fart). sorry, the evidence still indicates botf is on life support.

Totally rigged and you know it. Hypocrite. The responses on TBoF are natural and spontaneous. What are YOU so obsessed about? Hypocrite.

how? that's obssesed and then you call me a hypocrite?? lol! 'natural and spontaneous'? hahaha. what the fuck is that supposed to mean? let's see, the search function is worthless so you couldn't have stumbled in here searching, well, what would you be searching, 'botf'(?) yeah, maybe, 'procrastination' yeah that's possible too, but like I say the search function is basically nonfunctional so, let's see, why I think you're stalking me too, with your poisonous playmate. I think you're punching up my mbtu and fishing around to see what I'm doing. yep, you're a stalker. you'll notice my fine feathered birdbrain that I don't post on botf anymore so I have the right to post anything I please, so fuck off. stalker.

Clearly it is you who are stalking ellen, Michael.

Everyone can see that.

And I have the right to go and read and post as I please also. Is your new best pal, who loves to hang around piles of smoldering (this time you) you-know-what (this is Shameful Conduct, so I'll watch my fucking mouth) stalking you too? Rent Paid up until the end of the month?

And as usual, you didn't address the valid point of my post which is what you wrote is misleading bunk. My point being that TBOF is still in its natural state with responses made spontaneously and yours is contrived and unnatural. I don't care about that, I do care about the accuracy of your crowing claim here.

she (and tempo) want to have sex with me and stalking me is the closest they can come.

(and btw, anyone can follow an MBTU, you dolt. And anyone is allowed to.)

SpeakerNancy's Top Post from Friday on BOTF: 510 views a/o this morning, 65 posts in the discussion.

Of course, you wouldn't actually dare post something that HAD to acknowledge that post's success, now would you. Or most likely, any BOTF post's success. How truly pathetic you have become.

Where will you run off to, next, you flaming hypocrite? P.S. Stop emailing me, Ryerson.

Pot, calling kettle black. If I remember (and I do), you're a pretty damn skilled flirt for a ... 'happily married man,' Mikey. Cut the crap, cut the stalking and put up a real Top Post, would you?

Hi Ellen!

And you imply other people spend too much time on here? Get a clue, Mikey-boy. What's a happily married man doing on a website, stalking and flaming women he's never met, at 11:22 pm on a Friday night? Pretty shabby performance (but why does that not surprise us?)...(of course, there's always the possibility that Mrs. R. has transformed herself magically, somehow, into biteo. You two certainly spend an awful lot of time together these days ... and nights.)

here and you come looking for me. you're the stalker and no, you have no chance with me. are you going to post those emails? c'mon, you have my permission. if fact, I insist.

A post that is 100% about us garnered over 500 view of which 75% are tempo's and over 60 replies of which 1/3 are tempo's.

Can't you see how awesome she is? She and the rest of the ICP find us so incredibly fascinating, that is all that they can talk about.

I do want to make it perfectly clear here for my own self-respect, I am not here in tandem with anyone else at all. I post independently, I am a clicque of ONE, Tempo.

it gets away from me sometimes how desperately stupid she really is. she's holding that post up as an example of a post where she made a good faith effort to top post something which does NOT turn back on some other poster(s). and then the numbers (which you point out) are little more than an echo chamber where the ugly five are talking to each other. jesus, she's nutty.

Also, ifMR would care to subtract/discount the # of replies made on ... [you know where] yesterday by me when I was having a little fun with Dawn's "Tate Yourself" Top Post and then, Jack's Top Post and all replies to IT ...

well, Mike's numbers would have to come down ... considerably. For [you know where], that is. Just another display of "Shameful Conduct" dishonesty by young Ryerson here.